It is by a divine providence, I think, that Free Will
Baptists have been made stewards of a very pure strand of Christian theology—let
me call it “Arminian Baptist.” This strand of Christian theology is nowhere
else credibly preserved in North America or Western Europe
by a viable denominational body. To be sure, Free Will Baptists are well centered
in the mainstream of Christian theology, affirming the major creeds of the
Christian Church, enthusiastically endorsing the Protestant Reformation, and reflecting
the doctrine of the Believers’ Church by replacing Infant Baptism with
Believers’ Baptism. Within this larger context, however, Free Will Baptists
comprise the sole denomination that preserves the Arminian Soteriology of
Arminius (not all so-called Arminianism would be endorsed by Arminius) within a
Baptist framework. An historical survey would demonstrate the unique standing
of Free Will Baptists within this theological strand, but such is not the
purpose of this essay. Rather, assuming that Free Will Baptists have been
granted stewardship of this very pure strand of Christian theology, this essay
asks what responsibilities this stewardship entails for Free Will Baptists, and
suggests ways in which these responsibilities might be met.
Preliminarily, let me stress that this theological strand is
worth preserving. In an ecclesiological and missiological environment where
doctrinal distinctives are suppressed in favor of unity and cooperation, especially
as they are exacerbated by cultural and philosophical relativism, one is
tempted to undervalue theological purity and sound biblical interpretation. Yes,
Free Will Baptists should be eager to cooperate in various mission endeavors,
and should treat other Christians who disagree on denominational distinctives
as genuine brothers and sisters in Christ. However, precisely because Free Will
Baptists maintain a theological purity based on sound biblical interpretation,
they should promote their doctrine, form and nourish their closest theological
associations, and persuade other Christians from other denominations to join
them.
On a personal note, I began my graduate education with a
thorough grounding in Free Will Baptist theology, but without denominational
blessing or support network. Thus, I flew from my FWB denominational nest into
a world, academic and ecclesiastical, that would challenge my Free Will Baptist
theology at the highest levels, and at every opportunity, and with great
intensity. After the purifying ovens of my Master’s at Regent (under the
heavyweights Fee, Waltke, Packer, and Peterson—Assemblies of God, Presbyterian,
and Anglican), and even hotter ovens during my PhD at Cambridge with all its critical
elitism, I have emerged with my FWB theology fully intact, enriched, but not
compromised, clarified, but not altered. Free Will Baptists have a doctrine
that can withstand the utmost scrutiny and is worth preserving.
Privilege and Weakness
It is remarkable that such a potent and pure theology is
concentrated in such a narrow band of Christianity. One would think that the
elements which comprise Arminian Baptist thought—Baptist associationalism,
Congregationalism, Believers’ Church, a Whosoever-will Soteriology, and
Continuance in Salvation by faith—all sound doctrines based upon good scriptural
exegesis, would coalesce into a very wide swath of the Christian church. Such
is not the case. Indeed, one might argue that these doctrinal distinctives are
so rarely held that they are at risk of being lost, to be swallowed up by a
number of competing denominations that come close to such doctrinal purity, but
fail to preserve them in full strength and wholeness.
As it now stands, the FWB denomination is the sole domain of
Arminian Baptist thought. Free Will Baptists have about 2500 churches, and about
250,000 members. The denomination is predominately rural, with few churches in
the large cities; many states have no FWB church at all. FWB missions reach
into less than a dozen of the world’s 200 or so nations. FWBs are seriously
disadvantaged in terms of professional ministerial training, having no seminary
or graduate school, and with very few of its ministers attaining a basic MDiv qualification
or higher degree. Perhaps as few as 50% of FWB ministers have even a Bachelor’s
degree, in any academic major. FWBs with a terminal degree are extremely rare;
even at the denominational college where Bible is a required major, only two
full time professors in the areas of Bible and Theology have terminal degrees.
Very, very few Free Will Baptists serve as scholars outside denominational
institutions, so that Free Will Baptists have no perceptible impact on American
society, let alone, any world-wide impact. A bibliography of articles, books,
or reviews written by Free Will Baptist scholars published by academic
publishers would hardly fill more than a single sheet of paper. Outside of the
Calvinist-Arminian controversy, Free Will Baptist scholars are entirely
unknown.
Strengthening Our Grip
If Free Will Baptists are to nurture and expand their
stewardship of Arminian Baptist thought, an overarching plan needs to be
implemented to produce and train scholars devoted to the cause. My essay here
is no such plan, but does contain some limited suggestions, especially in
regard to FWB scholarship.
1.
A study needs to be implemented to detail
the needs and assess the present resources of the denomination, and to
articulate a vision for the future.
2.
The denominational college needs to be
put on a more secure financial footing to rectify weaknesses in faculty and
staff.
3.
A graduate school or seminary needs to be
established.
4.
Denominational scholars need to be
awarded sabbaticals, including income and expense stipends, to pursue scholarly
research and publication.
5.
Denominational scholars in the field of
biblical studies and religion should attend annual conferences such as Society
of Biblical Literature and American
Academy of Religion, with
expenses paid.
6.
Denominational scholars should prioritize
publication of journal articles in Journal of Biblical Literature and Journal
of Evangelical Theological Society, and similar academic journals. This can
only be done if the institutions in which they serve allow adequate time to
focus on such endeavors.
7.
A few students at the denominational
college who are especially interested in theology and religion should be
encouraged to attend these annual conferences under the mentorship of
denominational scholars.
8.
In particular, one or two scholarships
covering expenses should be awarded to deserving students annually, perhaps
qualified by theological papers suitable for publication in the denomination’s Integrity
journal.
9.
Denominational scholarships should be
established to support graduate and post-graduate studies for outstanding
students.
The introduction of outstanding students to the biblical
studies and religion guilds is extremely important for the future of the
denomination. While readers may despair of ever finding the money to support
some of these more or less obvious needs in these difficult times, sponsoring
young scholars would not require extravagant expense. In particular, how
difficult would it be to raise $2500-3000 per year as a special scholarship to
pay a substantial amount of the expense to send three outstanding college
seniors to the annual meeting of the Society of Biblical Literature,
accompanied by a couple of the denomination’s senior scholars? Even as little
as a hundred dollars from each of say, 20 state associations would cover these
scholarships. Likewise, even a token one-time scholarship gift of $1000 for a
deserving seminary-bound student would do much to strengthen the ties between the
student and denomination, and to encourage the student to think of future work
within the denomination.
Formulating a vision for the future of Free Will Baptists
may prove to be an insurmountable task. However, taking some smaller steps to
promote scholarship, and especially to foster the growth of young scholars, is a
goal that is achievable, and can be accomplished in just a few short years.
2 comments:
Quote: "Within this larger context, however, Free Will Baptists comprise the sole denomination that preserves the Arminian Soteriology of Arminius... within a Baptist framework."
While I am proud to be a FWB, I'm sure our General Baptist brothers would take exception to this quote.
Although there is much in common between General Baptists and FWBs, I know of no General Baptist theologian who articulates Arminius' penal satisfaction of the atonement.
Indeed, if General Baptists have theologians or scholars capable of articulating a view of the atonement, I think they would gravitate toward a governmental view of atonement.
Post a Comment